800 billion spent to legalize ILLEGAL ALIENS

Here is what they are doing for the southern ILLEGALs.....and yet we have an immigrant, from the North.... Married to a Military U.S. natural born citizen, can't even get her green card....In fact she has more of a right to citizenship than all the ILLEGALS....

************************************************************************************

************************************************************************************

Alex Jones' Battle For The Republic exposes how the elite are using illegal immigration and pushing amnesty as a means of pulverizing the American middle class and ensuring that U.S. citizens, black, white and hispanic alike, are forced to sacrifice their freedom and sovereignty as America is sunk into a third world cesspool.

The mini-documentary lifts the lid on how the backlash against rampant illegal immigration in America is a major concern for the Bilderberg Group, posing a threat to their plans to lower the living standards of U.S. citizens of all colors and creeds into second or even third world status.

What is the real agenda behind last year's massive pro-illegal immigration demonstrations and who is really behind them? Battle For the Republic traces the legacy of the movement back to the Plan of San Diego, a shocking blueprint for race-based genocide directed against blacks and whites in America.

The goal is to divide America by bankrolling the Aztlan movement, an extremist separatist plan on behalf of Mexican Ku Klux Klan style groups like Mecha and La Raza to "reclaim" the southern and western U.S. states, in order to eventually merge America, Canada and Mexico into a North American Union.

Battle For The Republic shoots down the myth that Mexico has any rightful claim to the south western states by carefully documenting the history of how the west was won, bringing it up to the modern day and highlighting how the elite are using the enraged Mexican mobs as a weapon of conquest to slit America's throat and sacrifice its sovereignty on the altar of globalism.

http://www.youtube.com/v/1EGm0izB8VY&rel=1&border=0

Hispanic Radio and TV stations owned by huge corporations based in New York spew hatred and division as Mexicans are radicalized and told that all their problems stem from the racist American middle class while ignoring the fact that the elite are the true cause of their misery, as taxpayers are sucked dry to fund welfare which only subsidizes the corporations that employ the illegals.

Illegal aliens are being granted God-like status by the elite and given rights that super seed those of American citizens. The film highlights the case of a man who was assaulted and arrested by police for expressing his first amendment right to disagree with thousands of illegal aliens marching in downtown Seattle, and how illegals who assaulted him and smashed his car were left completely alone while throngs of Mexicans cheered as an American was taken to jail for exercising his freedom of speech.

"Now you're bleeding, what's it like now, bitch!" yells one illegal as blood drips from the man's face.

Battle For the Republic ends with Alex Jones' infamous protest of Vicente Fox when he came to Austin to give awards to police for breaking federal laws by not arresting illegal aliens.

Fox was forced to cut his speech short after Alex Jones bullhorned the truth about his role in destroying American sovereignty, making headlines across Texas.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/immigration/battle_for_republic_exposes_real...

--- In ParanoidTimes@yahoogroups.com, Bond wrote:

Sent to you by Bond via Google Reader: Torture, Paramilitarism,
Occupation and Genocide via SteveLendmanBlog by Steve Lendman on
10/25/07 Torture, Paramilitarism, Occupation and Genocide - by Stephen
Lendman

On October 5, George Bush confronted a public uproar and defended his
administration claiming "This government does not torture people."
Again he lied. Once secret US Department of Justice (DOJ) legal
opinions confirm the Bush administration condones torture by
endorsing "the harshest interrogation techniques ever used by the
Central Intelligence Agency." It also condones paramilitary thuggery,
oppressive occupation, and genocide. This unholy combination is the
ugly face of an imperial nation run by war criminals. That's the state
of things today. First, the practice of torture.

Torture as Policy under George Bush

In a hollow posturing gesture, DOJ publicly declared
torture "abhorrent" in a December, 2004 legal opinion. That secretly
changed after Alberto Gonzales became Attorney General in February,
2005 and authorized physical and psychological brutality as official
administration policy. This continues unabated in violation of
international and US laws that include fifth and eighth amendment
prohibitions against cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or
punishment in all forms for any reason. These practices been
long-standing US official policy, nonetheless, but the mask came off
post-9/11 when former CIA Counterterrorism Center chief Cofer Black
(now Blackwater USA's vice-chairman) told a joint House-Senate
intelligence committee hearing September 26, 2002: "There was a
before-9/11 and an after-9/11(on the use of torture). After 9/11, the
gloves came off" and "old" standards no longer apply. They never did,
and Congress knows and condones it.

Further, George Bush signed a secret September 17, 2001 "finding"
authorizing CIA to kill, capture and detain "Al Qaeda" members
anywhere
in the world and rendition them to secret black site torture prisons
for interrogation presumed to include torture.

As White House Counsel, Alberto Gonzales then wrote a sweeping
memorandum to George Bush January 25, 2002 calling the Geneva
Conventions "quaint" and "obsolete" and claimed the administration
could ignore Geneva international law in interrogating prisoners
henceforth. He also outlined plans to try prisoners in
military "commissions" and deny them all protections under
international law including due process and habeas rights. DOD
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld was on board as well. In December, 2002, he
approved a menu of banned interrogation practices that allowed most
anything short of what would cause organ failure.

A new book called "Administration of Torture," by two ACLU attorneys,
contains evidence (from FOIA requests) from over 100,000 newly
released
government documents. It reveals how US military interrogators carried
out abuse and torture orders from their superiors on scores of
prisoners. The book quotes Major General Michael Dunlavey who had DOD
responsibility for interrogations of "suspected terrorists." He and
Guantanamo commander General Geoffrey Miller both told the FBI they
got
their "marching orders" from Donald Rumsfeld to use harsh methods at
Guantanamo that presumably were meant for all other US-run torture
prisons as well. It was also revealed that Rumsfeld was "personally
involved" in overseeing the torture-interrogation of Mohammed al
Qahtani. He was falsely accused of being the 20th 9/11 hijacker,
confessed under torture, and then retracted his testimony later as
completely untrue.

Torture violates international law. The (non-binding) Universal
Declaration of Human Rights outlawed it in 1948. The four 1949 Geneva
Conventions then banned any form of "physical or mental coercion" and
affirmed detainees must at all times be treated humanely. Its first
two
conventions protect sick and wounded forces in battle. The third one
defines who is a prisoner of war and establishes "minimum standards"
for POW treatment. The fourth convention applies to civilians and
affords them protections during war that require they be treated
humanely. All four conventions have a common thread called Common
Article Three. It requires non-combatants be treated humanely at all
times. There are no exceptions for any reasons and violations are
grave
breaches under Geneva and other international law that constitute
crimes of war and against humanity.

The European Convention followed Geneva in 1950. Then in 1984, the UN
Convention Against Torture became the first binding international
instrument dealing exclusively with the issue of banning torture in
any
form for any reason. These are sacred international laws all
signatories, that include the US, are bound by. No longer under George
Bush's unconstitutional "unitary executive" authority power grab
Chalmers Johnson calls a "bald-faced assertion of presidential
supremacy....dressed up in legalistic mumbo jumbo." Condoning torture
as official policy under it is Exhibit A.

In her important new book, "Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang
Defied the law," law professor and current National Lawyers Guild
president Marjorie Cohn calls torture abhorrent and violates at least
two US laws - the 1996 War Crimes Act and 1994 Torture Statute. The US
is also party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights (ICCPR) that guarantees the right to life and prohibits cruel,
inhuman and degrading treatment.

The 1996 War Crimes Act provides up to life imprisonment or the death
penalty for persons convicted of committing war crimes within or
outside the US. Administration memos from Gonzales, John Yoo, Jay
Bybee, and David Addington supported dictatorial powers for the
president and advised Al Qaeda and Taliban interrogators were exempt
from torture laws under George Bush's "commander-in-chief powers."
Cohn, in her book, explained "the Torture Convention permits no such
exemption, even during wartime."

Yoo and Bybee also distorted what constitutes torture by claiming
psychological harm must last "months or even years." Otherwise, it's
just harsh "enhanced interrogation" of the secret kinds George Bush
authorized in a July, 2006 executive order. They reportedly include
sleep deprivation, simulated drowning, stress positions, prolonged
isolation, sensory deprivation and/or overload, beatings, induced
hypothermia, and more that can cause irreversible physical and
psychological harm including psychoses.

The October, 2006 Military Commissions Act followed, appropriately
called the "torture authorization act." It gives the administration
extraordinary unconstitutional powers to detain, interrogate and
prosecute alleged terror suspects and anyone thought to be their
supporters. The law lets the president designate anyone in the world
an "unlawful enemy combatant," without corroborating evidence, and
order they be arrested and incarcerated indefinitely in military
prisons outside the criminal justice system without habeas and due
process rights. US citizens aren't exempt. We're all "enemy
combatants"
under this law. Anyone charged under it loses all constitutionally
protected rights and can be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment
including torture.

Ironically, on the one year anniversary of the Military Commissions
Act
enactment, Fr. Louie Vitale and Fr. Steve Kelly were both sentenced to
five months in federal prison for opposing torture. They also oppose
teaching it at Fort Huachuca, Arizona and tried to deliver a letter
with their views to the base commander, Major General Barbara Fast,
former head of military intelligence in Iraq. Both priests were
arrested for trespassing while kneeling in prayer on the base driveway
in November, 2006. In an appalling miscarriage of justice, the
presiding judge refused to allow any evidence of torture to be
introduced. He also ruled out discussion of the illegality of the Iraq
war and all references to international law.

Relief from these type abuses are nowhere in sight as leading
Democrats
condone them and now assure extremist Attorney General nominee Michael
Mukasey's nomination won't be challenged. He promises business as
usual
that's bad news for supporters of the law. He earned his bona fides as
a US District Court Southern District of New York judge by ruling Jose
Padilla, a US citizen, could be imprisoned without trial and held
indefinitely by the military.

Padilla spent three and a half years uncharged in a 9 by 7-foot
isolated South Carolina Navy brig cell where he underwent alternating
sensory deprivation and overload and was denied the right to counsel
for two years. Months of beatings, mind-altering drugs, and denial of
medical treatment destroyed his mind, turned him to mush, and him easy
pickings to convict on all charges without evidence he broke any law.
Under Bush administration justice, we're all potential Jose Padillas
in
a nation where the rule of law affords no protection, and torture is
the preferred means of social control.

Administration Outsourced Paramilitarism

The Bush administration believes anything government can do private
business does better, so let it. And that applies to the military as
well with Blackwater USA's powerful emergence Exhibit A. Author Jeremy
Scahill portrays the company as "the world's most powerful mercenary
army" in his frightening new book about it. It describes a "shadowy
mercenary company (employing) some of the most feared professional
killers in the world....accustomed to operating without worry of legal
consequences....largely off the congressional radar." It
has "remarkable power and protection within the US war apparatus" with
unaccountable license to practice street violence with impunity that
includes cold-blooded murder.

A congressional report indicates Blackwater received more than $1
billion in mostly State Department no-bid contracts since 2001. It's
to
provide security services for US diplomats, officials and others once
assigned to the military at around six times the cost and can be up to
$1200 per man-day. With Bush administration backing, it operates
outside the law and Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and is
immune from civil lawsuits like the military. Scahill calls the
company
the "Bush administration's Praetorian Guard" with "immunity and
impunity" to do as it pleases.

Today, around 200,000 private contractors operate in Iraq. Up to
100,000 of them are paramilitary mercenaries from companies like
Blackwater, DynCorp, ArmorGroup, Erinys, Triple Canopy and others like
the Australian-owned Unity Resources that murdered two Iraqi women
October 9. Blackwater is the largest, is close to the Bush
administration, and is cashing in big as a war profiteer from huge
continuing no-bid contracts.

The company was founded in 1996 by former Navy SEAL Eric Prince who's
also closely allied to the extremist Christian Right. Blackwater came
into its own post-9/11 and is now the world's best connected, largest
paramilitary army. It employs 2300 personnel in nine countries with
20,000 or more others on call as needed. The company also has its own
20 aircraft fleet that includes helicopter gunships as well as a
private intelligence division and a 7000 acre Moyock, North Carolina
headquarters Scahill calls "the world's largest private military
base."

Controversary surrounding Blackwater made headlines after its
mercenaries killed as many as 28 Iraqis in al-Nisour September 16 by
some accounts and wounded dozens more. It was only the latest incident
involving the company that has a disturbing history of instigating
unprovoked violence and then falsely claim it acted in self-defense as
Eric Prince told Congress saying his men act "appropriately at all
times."

A new congressional account from State Department and company
documents
reveals otherwise. It shows the company has been involved in at least
195 "escalation of force" incidents since early 2005 that include
previously unreported Iraqi civilian killings. In at least one of
them,
evidence proved Blackwater personnel tried covering up what happened
with a falsified report, and the State Department made no effort to
hold them accountable or order the company to pay compensation to the
families of the victims.

Agence France-Presse reported on September 16 Blackwater personnel
shot
recklessly "at everything that moved with a machine gun and even with
a
grenade launcher (as well as from two hovering helicopters). There was
panic. Everyone tried to flee. Vehicles tried to make U-turns to
escape. There were dead bodies and wounded people everywhere. The road
was full of blood. A bus was also hit and several of its occupants
were
wounded." Among the dead were women and children. A daughter
witnessing
her mother shot in the head and killed said: "They are killers. I
swear
to God, not one bullet was shot at them. Why did they shoot us?"

Following the incident, investigations were launched that are little
more than damage control cover-up. The FBI is involved as well as a
joint American-Iraqi inquiry. Iraqi prime minister al-Maliki has gone
back and forth on this one. At first, he demanded Blackwater personnel
leave Iraq. He then backed down under pressure. He'll likely await the
inquiry's findings that are out in part from Iraqi investigators, but
again said he wants Washington to sever all Blackwater ties, remove
the
company from Iraq in six months, and have it pay each family $8
million
in compensation.

It won't ever happen, even though early findings conclude Blackwater's
actions were unprovoked, the al-Nisour massacre was a deliberate
crime,
those involved in it should be charged, put on trial, and the families
of victims fairly compensated. The findings are similar to an initial
US military report that one Pentagon official confirmed saying
Blackwater's actions were "obviously excessive, it was obviously
wrong.
The civilians....didn't have any weapons (and) none of the IP (Iraqi
police) or any local security forces fired (on Blackwater)."

Investigations are still continuing, the State Department is in damage
control mode, and an October 4 House-passed bill (not retroactive)
just
made US contractors accountable for felony crimes under the 2000
Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA). In addition, new
operating procedures have been instituted to paper over the whole
affair. Nothing, in fact, will change, however. Blackwater personnel
will stay in place, none of them will face criminal charges, and
things
are again business as usual with the company's paramilitaries back on
Iraqi streets after being banned from operating there by an impotent
prime minister.

A sign of things to come came a day ahead of the October House
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Blackwater hearing. It
was
revealed the company's Presidential Airways subsidiary got a new
government contract to supply aircraft, crew and equipment for flight
operations in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan.
Blackwater personnel may likely show up anywhere and currently patrol
New Orleans streets for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
post-hurricane Katrina. Their presence is menacing everywhere, and
they
may show up soon in a neighborhood near you as the "war on terrorism"
touches down at home.

Imperial Conquest and Occupation

Current rhetoric aside, even Alan Greenspan's new book admitted
what's "politically inconvenient to acknowledge (but) everyone knows:
the Iraq war is largely about oil" and it was "essential" Saddam be
removed to control it. Unmentioned was Iraq's importance that explains
why Washington plans permanent occupation of the country. The Middle
East has two-thirds of the world's proved oil reserves; Iraq has the
most untapped amounts of it; and it's the easiest gotten, cheap to
refine light sweet kind Big Oil covets. The country is also
strategically located between Saudi Arabia and Iran at the top of the
Persian Gulf. That makes it a perfect site for military bases sitting
atop an ocean of oil worth trillions of dollars and surrounded by lots
more of it.

The strategy to seize it was simply conceived but hopelessly flawed -
replace the "cradle of civilization" with a newly created free market
paradise with all that oil as grand prize pickings. It's still up for
grabs, but a huge supportive infrastructure is in place and still
being
built for permanent occupation.

By May, 2005, US forces were operating out of 106 bases around the
country from an original 120 number of sites. They range in size from
the huge Main Operating Base (MOB) Camp Victory complex near Baghdad
airport with thousands of US troops to others for fewer numbers called
Forward Operation Sites (FOS) that are still major installations.
There
are also many smaller Cooperative Security Locations (CSL) as well as
prisons and detention facilities throughout the country plus others
for
Iraqi military and police units.

A sign of permanency are four to six or more super-bases built and
planned, the largest of which is the huge Balad one. It's the major
Air
Force facility in the country with its state of the art "Kingpin" air
traffic control center (called the Common Grid Reference System) that
divides the country's airspace into "kill boxes." The Army's largest
logistical support center and secret Combined Joint Special Operations
Task Force (CJSOTF) are also there as well as well as thousands of
civilian contractors in neighborhoods charmingly called "KBR-land."

Balad and other major bases are enormous in size and on the order of
small towns. They encompass 15 - 20 square miles with double runways
as
long as 12,000 feet, and Balad's air traffic operates round the clock
and is comparable in number of takeoffs and landings to Chicago's
O'Hare that along with Atlanta's Hartsfield are the world's two
busiest
airports.

In addition, they have their own neighborhoods and kinds of amenities
found back home. They include department store-sized post exchanges,
fast food outlets, movie theaters with the latest films, swimming
pools, miniature golf courses, elaborate gymnasium and sports
facilities, satellite internet access, cable TV, air-conditioning,
international phone service and more. All the comforts of home
including takeout pizza and Monday night football in the middle of a
war zone.

Other major facilities are at al-Talil near Nasiriya in the South; the
largest Marine base at al-Asad in Western Anbar province; al-Qayyara,
50 miles southeast of Mosul in the North; the US military command HQ
at
Camp Victory/Camp Liberty near Baghdad International Airport; Camp
Marez near Mosul Airport; Camp Cook north of Baghdad; and a new base
near Irbil in the North. In addition, another new Forward Operating
base is being built near Zurbatiya near the Iranian border to be
completed in November. It's location is provocative as the centerpiece
of a new border control surveillance, monitoring and logistical
support
strategy called "Combat Outpost Shocker."

Then, there's what critics call "Fortress Baghdad" or the "ultimate
gated community" inside the city's four square mile fortress-like
Green
Zone. It's surrounded by thick blast-proof concrete walls, and to
enter
visitors must pass through up to eight checkpoints. Inside, security
is
intense and includes full body searches, electronic scanners,
explosive-sniffing dogs and every other human and high-tech measure
imaginable for security.

The US embassy compound is there as well that when finished will be
the
largest in the world. It's Vatican-sized in dimensions and hugely
fortified atop 104 acres, or six times larger than the UN complex in
New York. Reports vary on whether 21 or 27 buildings are planned but
their cost plus all facilities and perimeter security will top $1
billion. Construction is continuing, far behind schedule, it's
reported
to be shoddy, and it's already way over budget as predicted so the
final cost remains uncertain but will be plenty.

The compound has everything - its own water, electricity, sewers,
apartment buildings, swimming pool, shops, Marine barracks and will
house more than 1000 civilian staff plus a large private and military
security contingent. For the Iraqi people, it's a hated symbol of
imperial occupation Washington intends to be permanent, but it may in
the end go the way of the Saigon embassy in 1975. That's where the
last
US Vietnam remnants were frenetically rooftop-helicoptered out of the
country in humiliating drawdown defeat. It ended visions of permanence
then the way history may one day repeat in Iraq.

Imperial Genocide in Iraq

By any estimate, the human toll in Iraq is horrific from all that
happened after Saddam's August 2, 1990 Kuwait invasion. Four days
later, Operation Desert Shield was launched. It began with US-led
UN-imposed economic sanctions, large US and other troop deployments to
the region, and a sweeping Kuwait-funded PR campaign to win public
support for Operation Desert Storm that began January 17, 1991.

Before it ended six weeks later on February 28, US forces committed
grievous war crime violations of the Hague and Geneva Conventions and
UN and Nuremberg Charters. They included gratuitous mass killings as
well as bombing and destroying essential to life facilities that
included:

-- power generating stations;

-- dams;

-- water purification capabilities;

-- sewage treatment and disposal systems;

-- telephone and other communications;

-- hospitals;

-- mosques;

-- residential areas affecting 10-20,000 homes, apartments and other
dwellings;

-- irrigation sites;

-- food processing, storage and distribution facilities;

-- hotels and retail establishments;

-- transportation infrastructure;

-- oil wells, pipelines, refineries and storage tanks;

-- chemical plants;

-- civilian shelters like Al Ameriyya that was attacked February 13,
1991 by two laser-guided "smart bombs" killing around 400 civilians
including 142 children;

-- factories and other commercial operations;

-- government offices;

-- historical sites; and more in a willful malicious effort to return
the country to a pre-industrial age and punish its people
horrifically.

Lost was power, clean water, sanitation, fuel, transportation, medical
facilities and medications, adequate food, schools, private dwellings
and places of employment. Early post-war estimates placed the number
of
civilians killed at 113,000 (mostly children) according to the Red
Crescent Society of Jordan. In addition, US CENTCOM commander, General
Schwarzkopf and others, estimated 100,000 or more Iraqi military
deaths
plus thousands more killed gratuitously as they were retreating in
disarray.

What then followed was 12 years of the most comprehensive genocidal
sanctions ever imposed on a country as an act of vengeance and
US-imposed imperial arrogance. They were first adopted in UN
Resolution
661 four days after Iraq invaded Kuwait. They included a full trade
embargo that crippled the country economically but initially allowed
in
food, medical and other essential humanitarian needs. UN Resolution
670
followed in September, 1990 that imposed an air blockade and measures
to enforce it.

After the war in April, 1991, UN Resolution 687 was adopted. It
required Saddam accept cease fire terms and comply with Geneva
protocols banning biological and chemical weapons. It also affirmed
Kuwait's sovereignty, but it wasn't good enough for US officials who
wanted sanctions to remain in force until Saddam was removed.

Later on, the oil for food and medicine program was adopted under UN
Resolution 986 in 1995 but was hopelessly inadequate by design. An
internal UN report in 1999 revealed it delivered only $74 of food per
annum per person (about 21 cents a day) and $15 worth of medicines
(about 4 cents a day) with vitally needed items banned or in short
supply like syringes, anesthetics, vaccines, antibiotics and other
drugs. Everything with potential "dual use" was blocked - chlorine to
purify water, vital medical equipment, chemotherapy and pain-killing
drugs, ambulances, and anything Washington wished to deny the country
punitively with horrific consequences.

Further complicating things, all Iraqi funds were frozen and
administered through a US-controlled Development Fund for Iraq. In
addition, UN Resolution 661 stipulated all goods entering the country
had to be approved by a 15 member committee that included the five
permanent Security Council members. Approval had to be unanimous with
every member having veto power. The US representative abused his
authority by blocking items or causing long delays in importing
others.
The practice became so extreme, on one occasion baby food was denied
on
the grounds adults might consume it. At other times, items on the
World
Health Organization (WHO) humanitarian priority list were blocked such
as rice, school books, paper, agricultural pesticides, medical
journals
and catheters for babies.

The results were predictable and devastating. Normal life was
impossible and became a daily struggle to survive. It became apparent
by the mid-1990s many didn't or wouldn't:

-- the UN World Food Program (WFP) reported 2.4 million Iraqi children
were severely at nutritional risk in September, 1995;

-- in December, 1995, the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
said 12% of Baghdad children were "wasted, 28% stunted and 29% under
weight;"

-- by year end 1995, FAO reported 567,000 Iraqi children
sanction-related deaths;

-- by March, 1996, WHO noted a six-fold mortality rate increase among
children under five;

-- in October, 1996 UNICEF reported 4500 monthly Iraqi children deaths
from sanction-caused starvation and disease;

-- by 1999, the under five child mortality rate rose three-fold from
1989, malnutrition doubled, and the entire young child population was
affected;

-- UN Secretary-General Boutras-Boutras-Ghali noted how health
conditions deteriorated dramatically by the mid-1990s, and by 1997 the
WHO Director General said Iraq's health care system was systemically
broken; in addition, malaria, typhoid, cholera and other
life-threatening and communicable diseases were rampant.

These actions were committed willfully and are war crimes under
relevant Geneva Conventions and other international law. They also
constitute genocide under provisions of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide that "means any
(acts like those listed above) committed with intent to destroy, in
whole or in part, the national, ethnical, racial or religious group
(by) killing (its) members; causing (them) serious bodily or mental
harm; (or) deliberately inflicting (on them) conditions (that may
destroy them in whole or in part)."

US administrations under GHW Bush, Bill Clinton and GW Bush are
criminally liable under "the genocide convention" and other relevant
international law. Up to the March, 2003 attack and invasion, more
than
1.5 million Iraqis, including over one million children, likely died
from the combination of war and economic sanctions. Two UN heads of
Iraqi humanitarian relief resigned under them in anger and frustration
with Dennis Halliday saying in 1998 he did so because he "had been
instructed to implement a policy that satisfies the definition of
genocide: a deliberate policy that has effectively killed well over
one
million individuals, children and adults" including 5000 Iraqi
children
monthly in his judgment.

To date, most members of Congress are mute on the Iraq genocide and
continue funding it with hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars. Yet
on October 10, the House Foreign Relations Committee hypocritically
passed a non-binding resolution calling the 1915 - 1923 Armenian
holocaust (taking 1.0 to 1.5 million lives) genocide with a full House
vote on the measure still scheduled for November in spite of waning
support for it and uncertainty where it will go in the Senate.

Speaker Pelosi still backs the measure and in 2006 as Minority Leader
pledged to support legislation "that would properly acknowledge the
Armenian Genocide. It is imperative that the United States recognize
this atrocity and move to renew our commitment to eliminate genocide
whenever and wherever it exists." Today, Speaker Pelosi is mute on
Iraq, Afghanistan and fully supports AIPAC's agenda and its top
priority of war with Iran. She's not bothered by her own government's
genocide that far exceeds the Ottoman and post-Ottoman Turkish
Armenian
slaughter during and after WW I. The data below estimates as many as
four million Iraqis have perished from 1990 - 2007, but speaker
Pelosi's condemnation of it is nowhere in sight.

Dr. Gideon Polya is a well-published biological scientist who's
book, "Body Count: Global avoidable mortality since 1950," came out
this year. It "documents....non-reported (worldwide) avoidable death
(s)
of 1.3 billion people since 1950" including in Iraq and Afghanistan.
He
also published his data on millions of violent and non-violent deaths
under the three most recent US administrations in articles like his
October 7 one on Countercurrents.org. In it, he cites data on Iraq
from
the Lancet, UN and British polling firm ORB. His "Asian Wars" totals
in
Iraq, Afghanistan, Occupied Palestine and Lebanon are horrific, and,
if
correct, exceed any others published to date. A summary of his data
follows.

-- Eight million total violent and non-violent deaths in Iraq,
Afghanistan, Palestine and Lebanon breaking down as follows:

-- 70,000 "US-backed" Israeli-caused deaths in Lebanon from 1978 -
2006, 10,000 of which were violent killings "by Israelis" or
their "surrogates;"

-- 300,000 1967-2007 Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) deaths plus
another 10,000 violent deaths;

-- 200,000 violent 1990-91 Gulf war deaths;

-- 1.7 million 1990-2003 Iraqi sanctions-caused deaths including 1.2
million children under age five;

-- 3.2 million 2001-2007 US Afghanistan war deaths including UN
Population Division data totaling 2.5 million plus 700,000 children
under age five;

-- 2.0 million 2003-07 US Iraq war deaths including 1.2 million UK
polling firm ORB violence-related estimates plus 800,000 children
under
age five from UNICEF data; and

-- 500,000 2001-07 opiate drug-related deaths resulting from the
resurgent Afghan opium industry under US-UK occupation; the UN Office
on Drugs and Crime estimates its output at 93% of world production.

Polya cites the failure of occupying powers to supply
essential "life-sustaining requisites" as a major cause of preventable
deaths. He also notes his eight million estimate exceeds the
Nazi-inflicted Jewish holocaust total of about six million. And he
rightly observes that major media misreporting, denying or "ignoring
of
this horrendous, ongoing mass" slaughter is the equivalent of Jewish
holocaust denial and doing it endangers security for "both....victims
and....perpetrators."

There's no denying the toll on victims, but consider the cost at home
post-9/11:

-- a nation with no outside enemies permanently at war and claims the
right to wage preventive wars under the doctrine of "anticipatory
self-defense" using first strike nuclear weapons even against
non-nuclear states;

-- world stability and peace further threatened by the
administration's
abandoning NPT, ending Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty protection,
rescinding and subverting the Biological and Toxic Weapons Convention,
deploying so-called "missile defense" for offense, and plans to
weaponize space toward the goal of "full-spectrum (unchallengeable)
dominance" of all land, surface and sub-surface sea, air, space,
electromagnetic spectrum and information systems plus as much of the
world's energy resources as possible;

-- a military budget hugely exceeding the rest of the world combined;
The Independent Institute analyst Robert Higgs estimates the true FY
2007 budget exceeds $1 trillion with all defense-related items
included;

-- a rogue government operating outside constitutional and
international laws and norms with the Congress and courts criminally
complicit;

-- an unprecedented wealth disparity in an omnipotent corporatist
state;

-- growing social decay and poverty in the richest country in the
world;

-- a secretive, intrusive, repressive administration under a president
who disdains the public interest and is a serial liar and war
criminal;

-- condoning and operating secret torture-prisons around the world as
a
weapon of cruelty, vengeance and social control; and

-- a cesspool of corruption stemming from incestuous business-
govenment
ties that defile democracy and mock any notion of government of, for
and by the people.

The toll in Israel is evident as well. Angela Godfrey-Goldstein is an
Israeli Jew, based in Jerusalem, and the Action Advocacy Officer with
the Israeli Committee Against (Palestinian) House Demolitions (ICAHD).
On August 30, 2007, she delivered an address at the UN Conference at
the EU Parliament in Brussels commemorating the fortieth anniversary
of
Occupied Palestine. In it, she noted part of the toll on Israeli
society caused by 40 years of Palestinian repression:

-- around one million Israeli Jews "voted with their feet and left the
country;"

-- an estimate by some that up to 50% of Israeli youths refuse
mandatory Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) service plus a "grey" Air Force
refusal rate of around 30%;

-- a significant recent observation from John Pilger that "something
(around the world) is changing. (There's a) swell of a
boycott....growing inexorably....an important marker (may have) been
passed, reminiscent of the boycotts (preceding) sanctions against
apartheid South Africa" that led to the fall of its white-supremicist
government; and

-- her experience working with "diplomats, politicians and aid workers
in Israel and Palestine (shows) that, on an individual basis, there's
enormous personal support and empathy for the Palestinian cause"
because decades of abuse against them are intolerable and must end.

Push eventually will come to shove. We better hope it arrives soon.
The
world can't wait much longer.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at
lendmanstephen@...

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The
Steve Lendman News and Information Hour on TheMicroEffect.com Mondays
at noon US central time.
Things you can do from here:
- Subscribe to SteveLendmanBlog using Google Reader
- Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all your
favorite sites

--- End forwarded message ---

--- In ParanoidTimes@yahoogroups.com, "Kick.The.NWO"
wrote:

The Blackwater Massacre
Out of control 'private' contractors terrorize Iraq
by Justin Raimondo
October 5, 2007

On September 16, as a car approached Nisour Square, all the folly and
tragedy of the Iraq war was enacted on a Baghdad street. In the
vehicle were two Iraqis: Ahmed Haithem was driving his mother,
Mohassin, to the local hospital, where her husband worked as a
pathologist. They never made it.

Instead, four armored vehicles manned by "private" guards employed by
Blackwater USA moved into position and fired: Ahmed was hit, but the
car continued on its path, out of control. When the smoke cleared,
and the casualties counted, 17 Iraqis were dead and 24 wounded. The
Washington Post cites one anonymous high-ranking U.S. official as
saying:

"This is a nightmare. We had guys who saw the aftermath, and it was
very bad. This is going to hurt us badly. It may be worse than Abu
Ghraib, and it comes at a time when we're trying to have an impact
for the long term."

It's a nightmare alright, especially for the Iraqi people, who have
long resented this "private" army of thugs and wannabe heroes,
apparently subject to nonexistent rules of engagement. The Americans
have slaughtered, abused and otherwise alienated their "liberated"
charges before, and the Iraqis did little but bleat a few feeble
protests: this time, however, the government of Prime Minister Nouri
al-Maliki reacted with authentic anger. The Iraqi ministry of the
interior ordered Blackwater out of the country, and, although the
U.S. State Department initially succeeded in getting this order
rescinded, that reversal now appears to have been reversed. If Maliki
sticks to his guns, the Blackwater massacre could mark a new phase in
the war, one that bodes ill for the Americans.

This new phase was prefigured by what Seymour Hersh dubbed "the
redirection" and made manifest in the alleged "success" of our
alliance with the Sunni tribesmen of Anbar and Diyala provinces. As
U.S. war aims in Iraq have shifted from stamping out the Sunni
insurgency to preparing for war with Iran, the potential for conflict
with the Shi'ite-dominated government has increased: that's why that
anonymous senior official described the Blackwater massacre as
possibly "worse than Abu Ghraib." The September 16 incident could be
the pivot point leading to the previously unthinkable: a demand by
the democratically-elected government of Iraq that U.S. forces begin
withdrawing.

Ah, but they wouldn't do that – especially when their very lives
depend on the presence of U.S. soldiers – now would they?

Don't count on it: after all, they can always turn to their natural
allies in Tehran to afford them all the protection they need.

As Henry Waxman waxes eloquent about how bad it is for the American
taxpayer that we are "outsourcing" security for U.S. diplomats in
Iraq to private companies like Blackwater – and caves to a Justice
Department request that places the September 16 massacre beyond the
purview of his committee hearings – we are in danger of missing the
meaning of that deadly day. One has only to read the New York Times
coverage – which is, so far, the only coherent narrative – to get a
very clear sense of the horror and tragedy of our involvement in Iraq.

A road bomb went off in the vicinity of a "financial compound" where
U.S. diplomatic personnel were present, and an immediate order went
out to extract them. While one Blackwater convoy picked up the
diplomats who were on their way to Nisour Square at the time of the
incident, another convoy moved into the area and diverted traffic.
Blackwater officials have previously asserted that their personnel
opened fire only when they found themselves under attack, but that
account is contradicted by every available witness. As the Times
reports:

"The events in the square began with a short burst of bullets that
witnesses described as unprovoked. A traffic policeman standing at
the edge of the square, Sarhan Thiab, saw that a young man in a car
had been hit. In the line of traffic, that car was the third vehicle
from the intersection where the convoy had positioned itself.

`We tried to help him,' Mr. Thiab said. `I saw the left side of his
head was destroyed and his mother was crying out: `My son, my son.
Help me, help me.'"

Bystanders rushed to help, but the Blackwater guards didn't let them:

"Then Blackwater guards opened fire with a barrage of bullets,
according to the police and numerous witnesses. Mr. Ahmed's father
later counted 40 bullet holes in the car. His mother, Mohassin
Kadhim, appears to have been shot to death as she cradled her son in
her arms. Moments later the car caught fire after the Blackwater
guards fired a type of grenade into the vehicle."

Why did the Blackwater guards fire on a car that was nowhere near
their convoy until the weight of its dead driver on the accelerator
drove it in their direction? No witness recalls shots being fired
before the Americans unleashed their deadly fusillade. Yet the
Blackguards and their spokesman claimed to have been under attack,
possibly from Iraqi police. That's not how Iraqi witnesses tell it.
Says Fareed Walid Hassan, a truck driver caught in the intersection:

"'The shooting started like rain; everyone escaped his car.' … He saw
a woman dragging her child. `He was around 10 or 11,' he said. "He
was dead. She was pulling him by one hand to get him away. She hoped
that he was still alive.'"

Why were the Americans firing indiscriminately into cars at a busy
Baghdad intersection? This is the question Rep. Waxman dared not ask
at his phony "hearing," and which needs to be asked anyway. The
answer, I fear, is because if you're an American in Iraq, every Iraqi
is seen as an enemy. After all, a good proportion of the population
wants us the heck out of there, and believes attacks on U.S.
soldiers – or "private contractors" – are entirely justified. In such
an atmosphere, who wouldn't be trigger-happy, not to mention paranoid
and driven half-mad by the ever-looming prospect of imminent danger?

The issue is not private contractors, per se, although the rules of
engagement followed by the Blackguards are considerably more relaxed
than those in force for the U.S. military: U.S. soldiers have been
involved in similar incidents, and a lot worse. The point is that we
are an occupying force, and are seen as such by the increasingly
resentful Iraqis: whether private or U.S. government-owned-and-
operated, an army of occupation is going to meet resistance, and so
we have. We are fast reaching a critical point – when growing
resentment and even hatred of the Americans takes the shape of a
demand for some accountability from the occupiers.

The official Iraqi investigation into the September 16 incident has
been concluded, and submitted to the government: a three-man panel,
headed up by the Iraqi defense minister, recommends the Blackguards
stand trial in Iraq, under Iraqi law – an explosive demand that could
lead to an open rupture between the Maliki government and Washington.

If ever Iyad Allawi had a chance to take advantage of an American-
sponsored coup, surely that moment, if it isn't already upon us,
cannot be far.

The rising political firestorm over the Blackwater massacre runs up
against a legal firewall in the form of an edict issued by Paul
Bremer, former U.S. viceroy, that forbids US military personnel
(including private contractors) from being charged by Iraqi
authorities or tried in Iraqi courts. It was one of his last acts,
one that put the lie to the American proclamation of
Iraqi "sovereignty."

The crisis will come when Iraqi demands for justice collide with the
reality of Iraq's de facto status as a U.S. colony. In the event of a
showdown over this case – and over the larger issue of sovereignty –
the Americans will either go to war with the government they hailed
as the vanguard of the region's democratic transformation, or else
pack up their gear and go.

I'm betting on the former. In a war full of ironic twists and turns,
this would be the crowning example of what Chalmers Johnson
calls "blowback" – the unintended consequences of U.S. government
intervention overseas that blow back in our faces. With one very
important difference, however: it's hard to believe that growing
tensions between Washington and the Shi'ite-dominated Maliki
government, while unintended, were altogether unanticipated.

In their planned war with Iran, surely the best the neocons can hope
for is a neutral – or effectively neutralized – Iraqi government. It
doesn't take much imagination, however, to project the possibility of
U.S. troops facing off against the Shi'ite party militias run by the
parties of the ruling coalition.

How will our War Party explain this rather disturbing turn of events
to their bewildered and war-weary constituency, which is, at any
rate, shrinking fast? Easy. By that time, the image of a nuke-
wielding terrorist-sponsoring Saddam Hussein will have long since
morphed into a nuclear-armed, Hezbollah-sponsoring Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad, bound and determined to wipe Israel off the map.

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=11711

--- End forwarded message ---

--- In ParanoidTimes@yahoogroups.com, "Les Lemke"
wrote:

This is my response to the article below.

For some strange reason certain people, both in civilian life as well
as in the employ of the U.S. Government think they can do whatever
they want to people and that there will be no repercussion to them
for their actions. They think they are "special" or they think they
are so protected against their actions that nothing will ever happen
to them as a result of their evil doing.

Well, here's a newsflash for them:

EVENTUALLY everyone dies. We're mortal. We have a lifespan of X
number of years on this planet and then our body dies. NO ONE escapes
death! No one! As far as THIS reality is concerned IT'S OVER....and
no, you can't take your nice house, your big bank account, your nice
cars or your luxurious swimming pool with you. Your soul leaves your
body and *ALL* earthly posessions are left behind on this planet.

You leave this world NAKED!

You take NOTHING with you!

THEN, you get to meet your maker!

THEN you get to answer to Him for your actions on this planet.

Some people think this won't happen. They are simply deluding
themselves of the fact that there is your body and then there is your
soul. Your body dies and rots. Your soul goes back for the reckoning.

One way or the other you WILL pay for your evil behavior on this
planet. There is no getting out of it.

Chew on that FACT for a while!



----- Original Message -----
From: gs
To: ParanoidTimes@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: [ParanoidTimes] The FBI's 'Right' to Threaten Torture



I hope that all of the corrupt federal scum enjoy their eternity in
hell.
gs
----- Original Message -----
From: Bond
To: ParanoidTimes@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 2:05 AM
Subject: [ParanoidTimes] The FBI's 'Right' to Threaten Torture








Sent to you by Bond via Google Reader:


The FBI's Right to Threaten Torture
via BOVARD by Jim on 10/26/07


The following op-ed is being shotgunned out today by the Future
of Freedom Foundation.

THE FBI'S RIGHT TO THREATEN TORTURE

by James Bovard

A federal appeals court has concluded that an FBI agent must go
to trial on charges he coerced a false confession out of a prime
suspect in the 9/11 attacks. But the FBI still insists that its agent
did nothing wrong. And the feds swayed the court to suppress that
portion of a recent decision detailing how the FBI agent used the
threat of torture to break an innocent man.

Abdallah Higazy, a 30-year-old Egyptian student, arrived in New
York City to study engineering at the Polytechnic University in
Brooklyn on August 27, 2001. A U.S. foreign-aid program reserved and
paid for his room at the Millennium Hilton Hotel, next to the World
Trade Center. After the first plane crashed into the World Trade
Center, Higazy hot-footed it out of the hotel. After the terrorist
attack, the hotel was sealed.

Three months later, guests were allowed to retrieve their
belongings. When Higazy went to the hotel on December 17, he was
arrested and accused of possessing an aviation radio. (A hotel
security guard reported finding the radio in a safe in his room.)
Higazy denied owning the radio. He was arrested as a material witness
and locked up in solitary confinement.

Higazy wanted to clear his name so he agreed to take a polygraph
test. FBI agent Michael Templeton wired him up for the test but then
proceeded to browbeat him for three hours until he finally admitted
to owning the radio. Higazy said the FBI agent warned him, "If you
don't cooperate with us, the FBI will ... make sure Egyptian security
gives your family hell." The FBI refused to permit Higazy's attorney,
Robert Dunn, to be in the room while he was given the polygraph.
After the interrogation, Higazy was "trembling and sobbing
uncontrollably," according to Dunn.

On January 11, 2002, Higazy was indicted for lying to a federal
agent. U.S. Attorney Dan Himmelfarb declaimed that "the crime that
was being investigated when the false statements [about the radio]
were made is perhaps the most serious in the country's history. A
radio that can be used for air-to-air and air-to-ground communication
is a significant part of that investigation." The Washington Post
noted that "federal officials paraded [Higazy] before the media as a
terrorist." The feds never bothered checking with the U.S. foreign-
aid program to find out whether Higazy's story about why he was
staying at the hotel next to the World Trade Center was true.

The prosecutorial celebration flopped three days later when an
American pilot showed up at the Millennium Hilton Hotel and asked for
the aviation radio he had left in his room when the hotel was
evacuated on 9/11. It soon became apparent that the hotel security
guard (a former cop who had been fired by the Newark Police
Department) had lied about finding the radio in Higazy's room. The
case collapsed and, a few days later, Higazy was awarded $3 for
subway fare and released from jail. The FBI conducted an internal
investigation and absolved Templeton of any wrongdoing.

In late 2002 Higazy sued, asserting that the FBI's coercive
interrogation violated his Fifth Amendment rights against self-
incrimination. Federal judge Naomi Buchwald dismissed his case,
declaring, "[Agent] Templeton's conduct and threats as a matter of
law cannot be classified as conscience-shocking or constitutionally
oppressive." Perhaps Buchwald believed that as long as Higazy's
mother and sister were not brutalized in front of him during the
interrogation, the FBI had done nothing wrong.

A federal appeals court overturned this decision on October 19,
declaring that Higazy's case deserved to go to trial. The original
version of the decision detailed the tactics Templeton purportedly
used to get Higazy's confession. Two hours later, the court removed
that portion of the decision from the Internet. The redacted portion
of the decision (captured by bloggers before it was taken down) noted
that the FBI agent admitted to knowing that Egyptian "laws are
different than ours, that they are probably allowed to do things in
that country ... yeah, probably about torture, sure." Thus, Templeton
was aware that his threat would terrify Higazy.

The revised court decision replaced such key details with the
following mundane notice: "For the purposes of the summary judgment
motion, Templeton did not contest that Higazy's statements were
coerced."

The FBI has long taught its agents that subjects of their
investigation have "forfeited their right to the truth," according to
the ethics study guide at the FBI Academy. Perhaps, according to
federal lawmen, it is a small step from lying to suspects to
threatening to have their kinfolk tortured. The agency has done
nothing in the nearly six years since this case began to indicate
that the methods used in the Higazy case did not receive the full
approval of FBI headquarters.

The initial Higazy arrest and release were landmarks showing how
far feds would go to gin up evidence and headlines for the war on
terror. The fact that the FBI approved of its agent's methods - and
the fact that a federal judge saw no problem with the interrogation -
are further warning signs of constitutional decay. Keep your eyes on
this case, because it could help determine how far feds can go to
destroy innocent people.

James Bovard is the author of Attention Deficit Democracy [2006]
as well as The Bush Betrayal [2004], Lost Rights [1994] and Terrorism
and Tyranny: Trampling Freedom, Justice and Peace to Rid the World of
Evil (Palgrave-Macmillan, September 2003) and serves as a policy
advisor for The Future of Freedom Foundation





Things you can do from here:
a.. Subscribe to BOVARD using Google Reader
b.. Get started using Google Reader to easily keep up with all
your favorite sites

--- End forwarded message ---

--- In ParanoidTimes@yahoogroups.com, "john808asd"
wrote:


Hi. My name is John. This is not my real name. I am using it to
preserve a little privacy. All other names and events are real. I
would like to share with group information of social significance.
FBI had developed new type of non-lethal weapon which is able among
other effects induces anxiety. They are using it against the US
residents. I believe this type of non-lethal weapon unlike a police
baton or mace poses a great threat to the civil society and has far
going consequences for the humanity. I understand that it is hard to
believe that such thing could happen in the US, the forefront of the
western democracy. When it happened to me I was shocked, I was
stumped, I could not believe it. But it happened to me and turned my
life into a nightmare. Using and further advancing this technology
could turn the US into the worst type of a tyranny disguised as a
democracy.

I want to tell how I encountered this problem from the very
beginning. My story began approximately 7-6 years ago when me and my
ex-wife won a green card and immigrated to New York in 2000. We came
from former USSR where I worked as a psychiatrist. In the USA I
started to work as a construction worker. We were full of enthusiasm
to start new life here even if it was not easy. In 2001 I started to
work as a security guard. Police officers, the friends of a building
superintendent where I worked, knowing that I came from former
USSR sometimes jokingly called me `John KGB'. One day when police
officer Richard called me over the radio `John KGB' and asked what I
was doing, I answered jokingly `I am developing operative contact
with American policemen inspector Mahony.'

I started to work for McRoberts Protective Agency as a fire safety
director in 2004. My permanent work place was Jolly Madison Hotel. To
my surprise I discovered that all my coworkers there considered me a
former KGB officer. They asked me about it directly a few times,
talked about me as a former KGB employee and joked about it I decided
that my joke about developing operative contact with a police officer
sounded too professionally. In the Skyline Hotel where I used to work
my coworkers also considered me as an ex-KGB officer. I want to state
clearly that I have never worked (and I am not working) for KGB or
any other intelligence agency. But unfortunately back in my country I
was too curious and had read a lot about surveillance, nvestigations,
military special operations, marshal arts and similar topics.

In Jolly Madison Hotel some people didn't like me because they
considered me as Jewish. Irony is that I am not a Jewish. I am
Christian with my last name similar to Jewish. A few times I was
removed from Jolly Madison Hotel due to my lack of communication
skills. I have never argued about that. Later, because Mc Roberts was
shorthanded, I was put back to Jolly Madison Hotel but removed again.
This happened a few times. In April 2007 when my coworkers stopped
talking to me, I told the assistant front desk manager Mr. Mario
Chiavuzzo that I would prefer to have good relationship with the
people I worked with. I explained that I could not talk to the people
when anybody wanted to talk to me. If the people hate me and don't
want to talk to me, I can't talk to them. I told Mr. Chiavuzzo that
the policy to ostracise me and shun down me from communication had
been introduced by his predecessor Mr. Srdan. Immediately after this
conversation Mr. Chiavuzzo met with the hotel undercover investigator
Mr. Marko. The hotel management decided that somebody from hotel
employees leeks this information to me. My understanding was that
they were afraid that I could file a lawsuit. I wanted only to keep
the job and don't be bulled, but the hotel management perceived this
situation as a threat to their safety and hired private investigators
to deal with the issue. I started detecting surveillance imposed on
me by the private investigators. In May 17 2007 I find myself
under FBI surveillance which was totally different level of
surveillance. I want to explain how I was able to detect the
surveillance. As a psychiatrist and psychotherapist I spend many
years in the psychotherapeutic groups (as a trainee, a
psychotherapist) and became sensitive to the extra-verbal
communication. I also have read extensively about surveillance, so it
was relatively easy for me to detect the extra-verbal clues of
surveillance by transferring my previous experience as a
psychotherapist into this new field. Once I started to do this, it
became increasingly easy for me to detect the surveillance. I was
gaining experience really fast. Because it is believed that regular
people can't detect surveillance without special training, FBI
started seeing me as an intelligence officer. At the beginning
I wasn't afraid of the FBI surveillance and investigation because I
am not involved in any kind of unlawful activity. I even considered
this as an interesting adventure. I tried to explain the situation to
FBI on June 1 2007, but as I was told by a FBI officer on duty that
the agency could talk to me only at the certain point of
investigation and that it is for FBI discretion. I believed that as
soon as FBI fined out that I was not breaking the law, this story
would end. Unfortunately, this didn't happened and at a certain point
surveillance was turned into a special operation. Because I am a
lawful US resident and a foreign national, it makes easier for FBI to
put me under surveillance and start a special operation. As many
analysts write the provisions of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
act of 1978 are very broad and even US citizen could be put under
surveillance without court warrant.

Soon after I detected the surveillance imposed by FBI, I detected
hidden surveillance camera installed in my apartment. How to do it I
have learned at the internet. When illuminated by light at the
certain angle, lenses of a hidden camera reflects light ( the same
way as a cats eyes in the darkness or reflective surface on the road
at night ) While working as a fire safety director and security guard
I tried to do this in the Skyline Hotel. During my rounds at night I
illuminated the sealing of the conference room with the flashlight
and have seen shining dots of light reflected by the lenses of
hidden cameras which otherwise can't be seen. This is the simplest
method of detecting hidden cameras; professionals could use other
methods as well.

So, when on May 21 2007 I noticed a little bump on the sealing which
wasn't there before I turned off light and illuminated this spot with
the flashlight. In the middle of the bump I observed tiny dot of
light reflected by the lenses of the hidden camera. These lenses were
much smaller and harder to detect than lenses of the hidden cameras
which I have seen in the hotel. They were seen only when I positioned
my eyes and flashlight at the certain angle to the sealing. After 3-5
minutes or so, before I decided what to do, I heard somebody was
running on the roof. Then I heard as somebody was unscrewing
something and at the same time the shining dot of
light disappeared. I have never seen it again.

I live on the sixth floor and there is a roof right above me. It was
quiet evening, about 22.30-22.45. I was standing close to the sealing
and have heard each sound very clearly. At that time no one could
work on the roof ( except FBI agents of cause ). Never again I was so
close to find a material evidence of the surveillance. I can't
compete with the professionals.

On May 22 2007 I noticed strange high pitched noise in my apartment
which I have never experienced before. It sounded like hissing or
whistling. Somehow it reminds me noise from ultrasound stain remover.
However, this noise was very unusual, different from ambient noise
originated from regular sources, appliances. Next day I also heard
this noise, then for a few days it disappeared and appeared again.
Since then I have this noise in my apartment. The noise could vary
slightly in pitch and intensity. It is not loud, almost on the
threshold of sensation. This noise evoke very vague and
unpleasant sensation in the body. Depending on the pitch and
intensity the noise cause sensation of something piercing the
eardrums, putting pressure on the head, causing malaise, tiredness
and exhaustion, desire to live apartment as soon as possible. At
certain frequencies this noise is moreunpleasant and could induce
anxiety. When I leave apartment this noise and the sensentions
disappear. I am divorced and live alone in my studio. I believe this
noise and symptoms that I experience are the result of FBI special
operation with non-lethal weapon.

I am not a specialist and do not know what type of physical medium
they are using as the non-lethal weapon. It is known that infrasound
could induce anxiety. But infrasound easily penetrates the wall and
is hard to confine in one apartment. Also, I think that infrasound is
not perceived like high pitched noise. What they are using might be
low intensity acoustic shock waves with specially designed frequency
of impulses. Intensive acoustic shock waves, for instance, are
created when a supersonic jet breaks sound barrier or during
thunderstorm and explosion. They could cause contusion to
the human body and destruction to any object on their way. Good
example of low intensity acoustic shock waves is a cracking sound
creating by bullwhip. This happen because the tip of bullwhip is
moving with supersonic speed. Actually it is the first man made
device which breaks sound barrier. Acoustic shock waves pulsing many
times per second creates sound field which never occur naturally.
They could affect the electrical activity of the brain and creates
very nasty effects in the body. The most likely frequency
range for this type of non-lethal weapon is very low (100-1000Hz) or
extremely low (0-100Hz). All physiological rhythms (brain waves,
cardiac rhythm, breathing and so on) lie in this range. All this
considerations are just my educated guess; there is a little
information about this topic in open sources. Another, less likely
option to consider is microwave auditory effect ( Frey effect ). This
effect occur as a result of thermal expansion of parts of the human
ear around the cochlea induced by pulsed/modulated microwave
frequencies, which produce sounds that appeared to originate
intracranially. Opposite to acoustic shock waves, microwaves are hard
to confine in one apartment. Acoustic weaponry projects are
intensively developing now. They use 33% resources funded by Armament
Research Development and Engineering Centre, Army Research Laboratory
designated to the new weaponry development. This is much more than
any other projects could have.

To solve my problem, I send e-mail to the FBI on May 31 2007 in which
I wrote `Dear Sir. FBI violates my civil rights granted by 4th
Amendment. Every day I am subjected to inhumane and vicious practice
by means of FBI special operations. All this occur because amateur
sloth from FBI believe I am a spy.' I also wrote few letters to
public and judicial officials but didn't get any help. In letters I
compared FBI agents to the pack of coyotes. I did it because I was
angry and shocked. Now I regret about the phrases `amateur
sloth', 'pack of coyotes' and I believe they could add element of
personal vendetta to my case.

Accidentally, step by step I got myself into trouble. All facts in
this story could be easily proved by independent investigation. But
as I understand FBI is not going to investigate their own unlawful
activity. We don't have another investigative agency to investigate
FBI. I can't find material evidence of FBI surveillance and special
operations and I can't compete with a team of professionals. Now it
doesn't matter if the FBI believe or not in my involvement in spying
or any sort of unlawful activity. Once they started this operation
they can't leave me alone as a witness of their wrongdoing. They will
try to undermine my credibility as a witness and eventually eliminate
me. Of cause they will cover my death, possibly as an accident. I can
get help from nowhere. What at the beginning was a curious
adventure turned to be a real danger to my life.

What they are doing is not only unconstitutional. It is simply evil.
Today it happens to me, tomorrow it could happen to anybody.
Orwellian brave new world was already born in the heart of American
democracy.

--- End forwarded message ---

LETTER TO TOM BUCHANAN @ THE BUCHANAN CLAN

Dear Tom Buchanan

Here is more fascinating, friend. I recently discovered that my husband's ancestors were Knights of the Garter. Please read my two links below carefully and you will see by yourself if you would check the first page titled: Line of Wise. Only 800 years ago, they were LORDS, land owners.
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-.nv5DWs8erSpEGVZKpn.gCLG93gBjAe_?p=913
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-.nv5DWs8erSpEGVZKpn.gCLG93gBjAe_?p=919

I just don't know for now if it is on his father's side or on his mother's side because both are possible since Ashley was descent of U.S. President James Buchanan (maybe his brother? or maybe Mr. Buchanan had illegitimate children, I don't know) and his mother was descent of U.S. President Woodrow Wilson - it is what my husband told me and this is really making sense since his ancestors were powerful Lords. So I am waiting the U.S. Historian Eric Phelps to communicate with me (I met him in person - eric@vaticanassassins.org ) to know the answer but I kinda want to do what I can to discover this in the meantime.

I do know that to communicate with the Knights of the Garder is surely not a easy task so I need to make a very good plan IF it is possible to enter in communication with them.

I need help if you wish to know the truth and it is not about my mental health. The way things are working with U.S. Immigration, I am a black sheep (everybody - I mean everybody - is giving me advices like they would think I am some kind of nut) because I just got what I needed after 15 months to drive my car and I was 12 months without being able to work and even 7 months without having a valid legal paper to do anything in the U.S. I am tired of the black sheep's role and God knows I am not worth that and I don't want my Ash to suffer all he passed through with Citizenship and Immigration Canada, U.S. Immigration, VA hospital and the last private hospital like nothing would happen. Immigration from both countries broke our lives and our plans (forced separation for 19 months when I don't even have a criminal record and when in fact they were not supposed to separate a married couple according to their own laws) and the VA hospital trashed his liver and I have all the papers to prove what I am saying and since I got a Master degree that proves that I am intelligent enough to know what I am talking about. They separated us on Nov. 3rd, 2004 so I lived a temporarily separation and as soon as we were reunited on June 16th, 2006 I was about to live the definitive separation on Dec. 5th, 2006 i.e. 5 1/2 months after.

I am extenuated because I am living hell since 3 years and I am doing all I can to see my life to change and worse case scenario, I'll go back to Quebec, Canada where I don't need to "lick their shoes" to have the permission to go to work and to drive my own car.

So my dear there is problems in Canada and U.S. Welcome to the New Word Order.

Thank you,

Marie Buchanan

Tom Buchanan <twbuchanan@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Marie

Thank you for your fascinating e-mail about your late husband and his ancestry.

I understood that President James Buchanan never married, although I am ready to admit that I may have been mis-informed!

I cannot see how the Buchanan Society can help you to trace your late husband's ancestors but, for Scotland, I would suggest that you try going on the web site for the Births, Marriages and Deaths in Scotland at www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

Best wishes

Tom Buchanan

Marie M. Buchanan, M.Ps.
Researcher, Webmaster, Pastor-Assistant, Translator, Blogger
http://360.yahoo.com/marielovesashley
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/How_To_Face_This_New_World_Order/

LETTER TO MY PREFERRED U.S. HISTORIAN, ERIC PHELPS

Here is the email I sent today to the U.S. Historian Eric Phelps. I met his family last week in Pennsylvania. I would love so very much to at the very least publish worldwide what happened to Rev. Ashley McDonald Buchanan, D.D. and it might help to know which side is the Wise family because his ancestors were Knights of the Garder. (photo below) I am aggressive enough (good aggressiveness) that I met the MP Marcel Proulx and Joseph Soares the political advisor of the most important Minister under Stephen Harper, Lawrence Cannon in person to make Ash enter in Canada at least as a visitor without mentioning I entered in communication with Karl W. B. Schwarz, one of the U.S. potential candidates. It went nowhere because somebody lied to the Canadian officials and I know who it is.

Marie Buchanan
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Dear Eric, my preferred U.S. Historian

I know Ash's ancestors were Knights of the Garder. Here's my blog about it.
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-.nv5DWs8erSpEGVZKpn.gCLG93gBjAe_?p=913

I'll send you a copy of the Line of Wise today but attached is the first and the most important page. Please tell me Eric if you can help me to find out if the Line of Wise is his mother's side or his father's side. His mother's name is: Hazel Ann Morgan and his father's name is: Herald Dean Buchanan. They were both buried in their family lot located in Savanah, Georgia. Mr. Buchanan died in February 2006 and Mrs. Buchanan died when she was 48 years old and she died when Ash was less than 20 years old and he was born in 1957 so she died around 1977 and was born around 1929.

Like you told me, English & French people were very good collaborators at the U.S. Revolution and I am sure we can do something great together and that is one of the reasons why I came to see you in person even if I am not rich.

My bet is it is his mother's side.

Thank you in advance in Jesus' name.
ysic,
Marie

Marie M. Buchanan, M.Ps.


Researcher, Webmaster, Pastor-Assistant, Translator, Blogger
http://360.yahoo.com/marielovesashley
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/How_To_Face_This_New_World_Order/

---

Photos:

ASH'S ANCESTORS WERE KNIGHTS OF THE GARTER

I got the line of the Wise with the old pictures in Ashley's belongings he decided to bring in his car from North Carolina to New York. (he bring with him what was the most important) Ash told me that his mother was the descendant of President Woodrow Wilson and that is father was the descendant of President James Buchanan about three (3) months before his death.

The Knights of the Garter (I can not upload the page number one of the line of the Wise) are very powerful people and by the way the Queen of England is their "leader". (sorry for the word leader, I know there is a specific word for her) Ashley's ancestors were lands owners, literally lords 800 years ago.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_Garter

I hope to find out soon if it is on his mother's side or on his father's side. I wish the border agent working for the Citizenship and Immigration Canada to know with who she messed with...

Tags: |

Next Post: SIMILITUDES WITH ASH Previous Post: LITERALLY FOUND ASHLEY'S TWIN - PART 2

• Refor…
• Offline

Your ancestors were LORDS, OWNING LANDS AND KNIGHTS OF THE GARTER. You may have lands somewhere and you don't know it yet.
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-.nv5DWs8erSpEGVZKpn.gCLG93gBjAe_?p=913

Marie x o x

"Anne" wrote:

If I can find my cousins phone or e-mail address I will forward it to her and see if she knows, she is the one that has done research on my moms side of the family, I do have a cousin on the other side that has done my daddies side. I will see if I can find these cousins to help you.

LITERALLY FOUND ASHLEY'S TWIN - PART 2

My dear friends,


Tell me what you think about what I said. Literally found Ashley's twin - part 1 is Ashley. Literally found Ashley's twin - part 2 is his twin from another era.

Tell me the truth since you are an outsider and I think most of you will tell me that they are identical except this hairstyle from another era and the only other difference that
Ashley was 47 years old with a smile
and this man on the picture is about 20 years old with no smile but looking a nice person.

I was sure he was Ashley because same nose, same lips, same eyes, same face, same ears and same body type but my friend who knows photography told me it can not be Ashley even if both are identical except the age difference, the face expression and the hairstyle.

Incredible but true. I am waiting Ash's sister reply about the Wise family because I found their genealogical line with the old pictures so they are surely in link but I don't know how linked they are/were. The Wise family have as ancestors the Knights of the Garter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_Garter

Thank you in advance for your reply and my friend is not only a great artist but he knows very well about photography and he is a eye witness that I did absolutely nothing to the picture to look old - it is just a old picture AND I AM VERY FAR FROM DOING A BAD JOKE BECAUSE I LOST MY CHARMING KNIGHT 11 MONTHS AGO. (check my 360 titled since I created it: Marie Loves Her Knight Ashley) I will find Ash's ancestors for sure. What I do know for now is that he is a descent of the U.S. President James Buchanan and Mr. Buchanan was a 33rd degree Mason.

Marie

Tags: | Edit Tags

Wednesday November 7, 2007 - 10:34am (PST) Edit | Delete

Next Post: ASH'S ANCESTORS WERE KNIGHTS OF THE GARTER Previous Post: LITERALLY FOUND ASHLEY'S TWIN - PART 1

• jimiraj
• Offline

Sorry you lost your hubby, but it is interesting to see somebody who looks like him.

Wednesday November 7, 2007 - 05:30pm (EST) Remove Comment

• Rex
• Offline

Well I must say there is definitely a lot of resemblance of blood line there. Quite remarkable....however they say everyone in this world has a close double.

Wednesday November 7, 2007 - 03:01pm (PST) Remove Comment

• Refor…
• Offline

Rex, this Sir is a Buchanan for sure because I got this pictures in my husband's most important belongings. jimiraj, this person looking like my hubby is dead for sure because he was about 20 years old in the 40's. It is just so very amazing how this man is looking just like him without being his twin.

Wednesday November 7, 2007 - 05:04pm (PST) Remove Comment

• Refor…
• Offline

Ashley's sister wrote:
Subject: RE: I solved the mystery
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 18:04:27 -0500
From: "Anne"
To: "Marie Buchanan" <marielovesashley@yahoo.ca>
I am amazed how much this man looks like my brother, I can see him especially in the eyes.

Wednesday November 7, 2007 - 05:06pm (PST) Remove Comment

• Refor…
• Offline

Ashley's sister comments:
Subject: RE: I solved the mystery
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 18:11:09 -0500
From: "Anne"
To: "Marie Buchanan" <marielovesashley@yahoo.ca>
I can not get over how much he looks like my brother. WOW!!!

Wednesday November 7, 2007 - 05:07pm (PST) Remove Comment

• Refor…
• Offline

Ashley's sister comments:

From: ANNE
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 18:31:52 EST
Subject: Re: I solved the mystery
To: marielovesashley@yahoo.ca
It is truly amazing how much he looks like him. Me too!!...I would love to know who this man is...

LITERALLY FOUND ASHLEY'S TWIN - PART 1

HERE IS ASHLEY, MY LATE HUSBAND WHO WAS MY CHARMING KNIGHT, MY PROTECTOR ANGEL
47 YEARS OLD AT THAT TIME WITH A SMILE AND A DIFFERENT HAIRSTYLE

LITERALLY FOUND ASHLEY'S TWIN - PART 1

HERE IS ASHLEY, MY LATE HUSBAND WHO WAS MY CHARMING KNIGHT, MY PROTECTOR ANGEL
47 YEARS OLD AT THAT TIME WITH A SMILE AND A DIFFERENT HAIRSTYLE