Marie 的个人资料Marie & Ashley Love The ...照片日志列表 工具 帮助

日志


9月10日

LETTER TO ERIC PHELPS BY THOMAS RICHARD

Before it will disappear from the cyber space like this link:
http://www.spirituallysmart.com/Nelson_Turner.html
Because that would be interesting to read about Nelson Turner, Eric's pastor from TR point of vue...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Letter to Eric Phelps:

Re: Monty Collier

http://www.spirituallysmart.com/letter.html

Subject:
Re: Monty Collier

Date:
3/3/2008 1:28:36 P.M. Eastern Standard Time

From: eric@vaticanassassins.org


Dear Thomas,
This man is no Calvinist.Brother Eric (Phelps)


(Eric Phelps has now flip-flopped
on this statement as well. -TR)


But it seems that Eric Phelps was correct when he stated Monty is no Calvinist. Look at this Reformed Theology message board and you can see Monty does not fit in and has attacked some men on there as well.

http://www.spirituallysmart.com/monty_collier.html

To eric@vaticanassassins.org

From Thomas Richards

Re: Monty Collier

Dear Brother Eric, Actually, Collier is making a name for himself among the reformed theology realm as well. He has made accusations toward people and they are also claiming that Monty is twisting their words and the meanings behind what people teach in their theology. Now he's attaching himself to you and will bring your credibility down even among Calvinists. Here is the forum where you can get a clearer picture of what is taking place: ~Link Here is more of Scott Clark's refutation of Monty ~Link/ Here is Monty doing the same thing with yet another person ~Link I suggest to you Eric that you look at these other sides of the story. Monty according to them is making wrong assessments of their theological teachings. Monty then makes a public video attacking this man, twisting the man's words around just like he did to me. This is another witness who is saying what i said. that he is twisting my words around and bringing false accusations against me. Besides that, What is the second chapter of James about Eric? can you really partake in twisting that chapter around to say "we shouldn't have good works"? or don't need them? James says positively that you must have good works and the Lord Jesus Christ says the same thing. "...can faith save him?" James 2:14 These are tell-tale signs that someone has Christ within them. the devil doesn't care about people.
The Lord initially revealed Himself to me through the first chapter of Proverbs where God says terrible things will happen to those who "...hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD:" Proverbs 1:29 Let God be true and every man a liar. God says here it's a choice. In Joshua 24:15 Joshua tells them to CHOOSE who they will serve. God presented it to me in this manner brother Eric right before i became a born again Christian and was instantly delivered from horrible anxiety, foul language, daily pot habit, chain smoking addiction and every other satanic bondage.For 11 years i have been delivered from these things.I cant talk about it unless this truly happened to me that day. God showed me He would laugh at my calamity unless i accepted His offer. "I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear cometh;" Proverbs 1:26 BECAUSE "YOU.." "... did not choose the fear of the LORD" 1:29 Thisis the same God I read about all through scripture. "No free Will" doctrine and "eternal security" doctrine totally cast away one's need to fear God. The fear of God will not change anything according to your Calvinist theology. But one of the wisest men who ever lived stated, "The fear of the LORD is a fountain of life, to depart from the snares of death." Why should I fear the Lord if I do not have "free will" and am "once saved always saved"? Logic has nothing to do with salvation. Nothing at all. But according to logic this belief in calvinism is illogical. Have Calvinists wrestled with scriptures via "logic" to turn them into a different meaning? Yes they have. Eric, I will say nothing more of this matter. Only that you have been warned.Monty is an uneducated, self appointed pastor of a church that doesn't exist. Why is he "self appointed"? because he has never gone up through the ranks as taught us by our beloved Apostle Paul. He never subjected himself an thus should be shunned as he has usurped authority even in the Calvinist realm. Montywas promoting the Roman Catholic Malachi Martin and will not stop harassing me. I reject his theology. That should at least make me a heretick and his eyes and he should therefore "reject" me as stated in Titus 3:10 I have done a video on this issue saying I reject their "debate" (Monty and Nelson Turner) and I reject their challenge and their idea of "Christianity". http://youtube.com/watch?v=6MnvzYUkSVM Monty and Nelson initiated all this. If they want a "debate" they have the whole "Arminian" realm to go after. The whole Internet is filled with the debate they desire. If James does not teach a man is saved by Faith and Works one can at least say it could be seen that way and is at the very least a debatable topic. And even if the Jesuits themselves look at that verse and believe it and add it to their doctrines it could be said that they believe a section of the bible. Will they do it? No they don't. I have seen expose' after expose' showing that these criminals have no "good works". Good works are OK Eric, although they will not get someone to heaven unless they have been washed in the blood of Jesus and allow the Lord Jesus to do those good works through us for verily we can do nothing with HIM. Yours in Christ, Thomas Richards
Date of Message: | May 12, 2008

评论

请稍候...
很抱歉,您输入的评论太长。请缩短您的评论。
您没有输入任何内容,请重试。
很抱歉,我们当前无法添加您的评论。请稍后重试。
若要添加评论,需要您的家长授予您相应权限。请求权限
您的家长禁用了评论功能。
很抱歉,我们当前无法删除您的评论。请稍后重试。
您已超过了一天之内允许提供的评论数上限。请在 24 小时后重试。
因为我们的系统表明您可能在向其他用户提供垃圾评论,您的帐户已禁用了评论功能。如果您认为我们错误地禁用了您的帐户,请联系 Windows Live 支持部门
完成下面的安全检查,您提供评论的过程才能完成。
您在安全检查中键入的字符必须与图片或音频中的字符一致。

若要添加评论,请使用您的 Windows Live ID 登录(如果您使用过 Hotmail、Messenger 或 Xbox LIVE,您就拥有 Windows Live ID)。登录


还没有 Windows Live ID 吗?请注册

引用通告

此日志的引用通告 URL 是:
http://marieandashley.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!8B96BB236F3ADEA1!1631.trak
引用此项的网络日志